Football Fans Take Note
Under the Lanham Act, which governs trademark issuance, a trademark may be cancelled at any time if it is scandalous or derogatory. Specifically, a trademark cannot "disparage . . . persons, living or dead . . . or bring them into contempt or disrepute." 15 U.S.C. § 1052(a). Only those claiming to be harmed by the allegedly derogatory nature of a trademark can file a cancellation proceeding under the Lanham Act. 15 U.S.C. § 1064. Petitioning tribal leaders claim to have suffered harm as a result of the football team name which they claim to be "pejorative, derogatory, denigrating, offensive, scandalous, contemptuous, disreputable, disparaging, and racist."
A previous group of Native American leaders filed to cancel the REDSKINS® trademark in 1992. The Trademark Board initially agreed that the term was disparaging, and cancelled the mark. See Harjo v. Pro-Football Inc., 50 U.S.P.Q.2d 1705 (TTAB 1999). However, the ruling was subsequently overturned by the District of Columbia Circuit Court on a procedural technicality. See Pro-Football Inc. v. Harjo 284 F. Supp. 2d 96 (D.D.C. 2003). The current petitioners may be able to rely on much of the evidence filed in the 1992 case and achieve a permanent result.
Notably, cancellation of the REDSKINS® trademark registration would not force the team to change its name. After 73 years of use as a trademark, the team might also retain substantial common law trademark rights.
Click here for a PDF copy of the full text of the tribal leaders' petition.
In communicating with us through this blog, you should not provide any confidential information to us concerning any potential or actual legal matter you may have. Before providing any such information to us, you must obtain approval to do so from one of our lawyers.
By choosing to communicate with us without such prior approval, you understand and agree that Sheppard Mullin will have no duty to keep confidential any information you provide.
